Another film paper. It is about Turkish movie Cemil. I tried to analyze the movie with the help of two outside sources. Let's see..
Looking
Cemil from Two Different Perspectives
Turkish movie Cemil is a movie that tells
us the story of a police commissar. From the very beginning of the film to the
end Cemil is a very brave man who beats every enemy or criminal in a very cool
way in which we hear Japanese kind of sounds associated with karate or
self-defence practises. His only energy source seems cigarette. Whenever he
gets bored or he beats someone he asks for a cigarette. This was very
influential for me. I mean after I had watched the film I just wanted to smoke
even though I do not smoke for years and I am not a big fan of it. The film
theme is, in a broad sense, suicide of a young woman Alev. Her dead body was
found on beach and nobody knows or sees her while she was committing suicide. In
the beginning we do not know why she committed suicide. As I have said the film
seems to deal with her suicide case, but in fact it copes with many different
ideologies. In this essay I will analyze the film from two different
perspectives within the context of specific details from our assigned readings.
To begin with, analysing of the
characters is an important element of the cinema. Cemil is a typical police
officer and he is very attached to his job. He would give up anything for his
job and his honour. As we see in the movie he never accepts bribes and also he
repeats same kind of statements multiple times in which he swears that he would
never accepts flattery and bribes no matter how fatal his needs are. Even
though his son is a disable child and apparently he has to find money but he
never does. His honour is like an oath, a kind of code for him. By saying code
what I mean is, it is like a heroic way of living. As we know from Homer or
Virgil, heroes live in the way they believed, they swear and they never give
up. Cemil is that kind of man and he is very heroized in the movie that no one
can beat him and he always wins, he is very intelligent, very right and
brilliant man. As I said he is very typical policeman and he is representative
of ideal policeman. “Stereotypes serve a lot here. The actors and stars bring
along their conventional qualifications. Small conflicts, competitions,
self-sacrifices together with obstructions, awards and punishments” ( Yalur
80). He serves a lot to stereotypes about policeman and he behaves as the way
he believes. From his dialogues to his work mates or his mistress and his wife
we understand that it is very common in this period to see inappropriate
behaviors of civil servants. We know from the Ottoman time, bribe or
corruption among government employees was the problem of all the time in our
history. Cemil is the representative of proper and honest civil service. In
other words he shows how it is supposed to be. It is the one of the primary
elements of popular cinema as Tolga Yalur says in his essay. “It is imperative
for the dominant fiction of Yeşilçam to provide the spectator with the maximum
likelihood of truth to make the spectators believe
in the “reality” it represents (Yalur 81). Cemil’s life is much more like
that. He has family and he has small conflicts like having mistress and at the
same time hoping to reunite with his wife and becoming again a family. As a
father he feels deeply responsible from his son because he is a kind of
sacrifices his son to be honest man. He wants to train him as the way he
believes that is why he brings him books and advises him to read and not to
forget anything about our glorious history. He is a kind of father who wants to
copy his identity to his child. This is the one perspective of evaluating the
film and the other is about nationalism.
In the film we see national motives
in many different scenes. Cemil always praises his nation and he is very proud
of being Turkish. All the time he mentions about how his ancestors defeated
Italians, British and so on. It is like director of the movie wants to imbue us
this deeply nationalism thorough Cemil’s speeches. I have supporter for this
theses “Film-makers were necessarily among those called upon to know and
represent in the cause of building the ideal image of the nation” ( Aksoy,
Robins 198 ). Apparently directors feel responsible to be influential about
some ideologies rather than just giving messages. With speeches of Cemil’s and
his advises to his friends and his children it is tried to create this kind of
deeply national image. Sometimes we hear national marches from background which
also serves this creation. Another thing is, the big enemy is foreign and most
probably American. It can be also a reflection of foreign effect within Turkey
and they are shown as enemies in order to subordinate this deeply nationalism
so to speak. In Turkish we have a special idiom for it which roughly says
neither pig can be hide nor infidel can be brother. Another passage of the
quoted article says “The imperative, according to Refiğ, was for Turkish
film-makers to find inspiration in their own ‘history and people’….to find ‘a
language that is right for the country’” ( Aksoy, Robins 201 ). That tells us directors of the Turkish cinema
were a kind of obliged to make films within the context of their own national
language and history. Apart from enlightening a suicide case the movie Cemil carries these concerns as such.
The film is trying to create a national consciousness which will provide
perpetuity of the nation. It is necessary for the protection to impose national
identity or consciousness and to show others as enemies.
To sum up, the movie Cemil can be considered from different
ways, in fact total analyze would be a little book. In this film we see how
directors carry about representing an ideal character which should be right and
honest. On the other hand the film is affected by conditions of its term that
is why it stresses a lot about national identity and corruption of civil
service. In the time of movie we know Turkey lost a lot of people in wars or
little uprises. We have many martyrs at that time and Alev’s father is the
symbol of this lost. Of course it is inevitable for any branch of art not to be
affected by the social, political and economical conditions of the time.
Works
Cited
Aksoy, A. and Robins, K. “Deep Nation: The National
Question and Turkish Cinema Culture”
in ed. Hjort, M. and Mackenzie, S. Cinema
and Nation. London, Routledge. 2000. Print.
Yalur, T. “ Dominant Fiction and Yeşilçam Cinema” in
ed. Dönmez, R. Ö & Özmen, F.A. Gendered
Idetities: Criticizing Patriarchy in Turkey. Lexington Books. 2013. Print.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder